The Curious Case of Derrek Lee

It might be...it could be...it's...caught, on the warning track.There are over three weeks until Opening Day, but the Cubs roster is mostly set. Such is life for a team enjoying period of stability that is rare for our lifetimes. There are some positions that are still up in the air–the second base spot that originally looked like an Aaron Miles/Mike Fontenot platoon is starting to look it’s Fontenot’s position exclusively. There’s still time for our favorite garden gnome to cool off and give Lou some thought to splitting at-bats with Miles, but right now Fontenot is making a case to play everyday. As the Swinging Ballerina is off playing in the WBC, he hasn’t managed to twirl his way out of a centerfielder platoon with Reed Johnson. Koyie Hill’s hot start to the Spring is giving all of us hope that we may yet be spared the Paul Bako Sequel, “Gabor Strikes (Out) Again”. Assuming that the Cubs head north with twelve pitchers, that leaves So Taguchi and Joey Gaithright (darkhorse: SAM FULD) to fight over the 5th outfielder spot, while Jake Fox, Micah Hoffpauer, and Corey Koskie (dark horse: BOBBY SCALES) fight over the 6th infielder spot.

In other words, there’s not a lot of intrigue this Spring. While this lack of excitement causes many of the twits in the local media to try to manufacture some drama, for most of us it is a welcome calm, as we can begin to turn our attention to beyond Spring Training. And when I turn my attention to the impending season, there is one guy that strikes me as an enigma and in spite of his reliability over the years, he is possibly their biggest wildcard.

What to make of Derrek Lee?

Beginning with the 2000 season, his third in the big leagues, Derrek Lee had been one of the steadiest hitters in the National League. From 2000 to 2004, Lee played nearly every day and put up consistent stats. His average numbers–.276/.365/.497, 28 HR, 84 RBI, 86 Runs scored–closely coincide with his median numbers: .270 (2002)/.368 (2000)/.504 (2004), 28 HR (2000), 86 RBI (2002) and 90 Runs scored (2004). Indeed, if any player seemed like a predictable player for the statnerds at Baseball Prospectus to project after 2004, it’d have been Derrek Lee.

And yet. And yet. Derrek went out in 2005 and done blowed up Nate Silver’s Macintosh G5. In an otherwise dreary, Dusty Baker-led sleepwalk of a season for the team, Lee gave Cub fans some reason for joy: .335/.418/.662, 46 HR, 107 RBI and 120 runs scored. Had that toothpick-chewing charlatan not gone out of his way to demonstrate just how criminally stupid he was in batting Neifi Perez and Corey Patterson in front of Lee for large chunks of the season, our guy Derrek may have had a shot at the Triple Crown.

Having turned 30 in September of the 2005 season, it was reasonable to believe that Lee had simply put it all together and had reached a new level. Even if these numbers were a bit outsized, a minor regression would still keep him above his previous five-year average.

Of course, thanks to the dangerous combination of an out-of-shape sloth, a reckless alcoholic and a slow-rolling grounder at Dodger Stadium, we may never know if 2005 was an aberration or the beginning of an incredible run. For the collision between Rafael Furcal and Lee not only put a sudden end to to Lee’s hot streak, but it likely hampered Lee’s power for when he did return.

Lee managed to come back in June and eventually get over 100 at bats for the season. Nobody expected his power to return so soon after breaking his wrist and it didn’t. For Cub fans, this was reminiscent of another star player whose power was still on the shelf even after he came off it. What was frustrating here was that in the following season, 2007, Lee’s power was still lagging. While his slugging percentage of .513 was actually higher than in any of his seasons from 2000-2004 (and his OPS of .913 ranked only second to the 1.080 he put up in his breakout 2005 season), Lee hit only 22 home runs. Cub fans old enough to remember the late Bobby Murcer couldn’t help but flashback to 1978 after seeing so many of Lee’s shots die on the warning track.

Still, though, there wasn’t much reason for alarm. One year removed from the broken wrist, Lee seemed to be getting back to where he was when he took off. The home runs, one figured, would probably come back with another year of healing. The fact that Lee’s batting average, OBP and slugging pct. had otherwise ranked up there behind his 2005 season would seem a pretty good indicator that Lee was back on track.

Which is what made last season troubling. His OBP of .361 ranked below his five-year average from 2000-2004, and his .462 slugging percentage and 20 home runs were his lowest since 1999. It would also be hard to make the case that this was due to the wrist. For one, he was now two years removed from the incident. For another, he was coming off a season where all of his non-home run totals crept back closer to a career-high.

So was 2008 simply Lee’s bizarro 2005, or is he merely a player in decline whose numbers from here on out are going to remind us of Mark Grace? A doubles hitting first baseman? Don’t get me wrong–on a team with Ramirez, Soriano and Bradley, one could do a lot worse than a slick-fielding first sacker who puts up a .290/.360.460 line. It’s just a little jarring, what with that 2005 season still in our memories. It’s also probably not the best idea to keep batting Lee third if he’s putting up that line.

Cubs

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

32 Responses to “The Curious Case of Derrek Lee”

Leave Comment

(required)

(required)